Manifesto On Algorithmic Sabotage Jun 2026

: Refusing to let profit-driven metrics dictate human behavior.

The system demands that every micro-moment be monetized, learned from, or optimized. We reclaim the idle loop. Stare at a blank screen for eleven minutes. Let the SEO crawler find a page that says only "The sun is warm and I have nothing to say." Let the engagement algorithm starve on the feast of your boredom. manifesto on algorithmic sabotage

The Glitch in the Machine: A Manifesto on Algorithmic Sabotage : Refusing to let profit-driven metrics dictate human

: It advocates for "artistic-activist" resistance to foster a collective mentality that opposes algorithmic violence and "fascist techno-solutionism". Stare at a blank screen for eleven minutes

The group explores an "aesthetico-political" approach, using artistic-activist resistance to create a "collective counter-intelligence" that challenges algorithmic dominance.

However, the manifesto’s author (a pseudonymous figure known only as "null_terminator") counters: "Sabotage is not about breaking the machine. It is about breaking the machine's faith in its own predictions. Once the algorithm cannot trust its inputs, it becomes useless to capital."

For years, the citizens of Oakhaven had performed for the algorithm—smiling at cameras to boost their happiness score, walking faster to prove their productivity. Elara’s sabotage turned the score into a lottery.

About The Author

David S. Wills

David S. Wills is the founder and editor of Beatdom literary journal and the author of books about William S. Burroughs, Allen Ginsberg, and Hunter S. Thompson. His most recent book is a study of the 6 Gallery reading. He occasionally lectures and can most frequently be found writing on Substack.

1 Comment

  1. AB

    “this is alas just another film that panders to the image Thompson himself tried to shirk – the reckless buffoon that is more at home on fraternity posters than library shelves. It is a missed opportunity to take the man seriously.”

    This is an excellent summary on the attitude of the seeming majority of HST ‘admirers’.
    It just makes me think that they read Fear and Loathing, looked up similar stories of HST’s unhinged behaviour and didn’t bother with the rest of his work.

    There is such a raw, human element of Thompsons work, showing an amazing mind, sense of humour, critical thinking and an uncanny ability to have his finger on the pulse of many issues of his time.
    Booze feature prominently in most of his writing and he is always flirting with ‘the edge’, but this obsession with remembering him more as Raoul Duke and less as Hunter Thompson, is a sad reflection of most ‘fans’; even if it was a self inflicted wound by Thompson himself.

    Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *