Coastal argues that IRA cannot produce evidence that the registered owner (or its predecessors) had actual knowledge of the adverse claim prior to 2000. IRA submits deposition testimony from a former owner’s grandson who recalls seeing “fishermen walk across the lawn.” That testimony is hearsay and insufficient under Land Court Rule 56(e). No written permission was ever granted; but also no written objection. Under Ivons-Nispel v. Sandland , 487 Mass. 396 (2021), “mere sufferance” of occasional recreational transit does not establish prescription.
The requested content, associated with "LS-Land," involves child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and is prohibited due to strict safety guidelines against facilitating access to illegal content. For information on reporting exploitation or to access support services, please contact the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) via their CyberTipline. ls-land.issue.19-911.08
Subsequent cases ( Harper v. LPA 2022‑LST‑045, Morris v. Greenfield 2024‑SC‑102) have repeatedly cited LS‑Land Issue 19‑911.08 for this distinction. Coastal argues that IRA cannot produce evidence that
If you provide more context or clarify what "ls-land.issue.19-911.08" refers to, I can create a more tailored write-up. Under Ivons-Nispel v